and mine for watching an adult movie shot in London ! That explains why i thought that the production seems less rustic than the average Dorcel flicks. Sure Lola is a cool actress and shows that she is talented for acting because here she does nearly mime : we can't hear what she says as the movie is continuously narrated with a voice-over. However it's the same filthy sexuality of Dorcel production in which women are just sexual toys for wealthy (and ugly) males : Some will say that it's not true as Lola learns to have an open sexuality. Maybe but she isn't autonomous : she is the pupil of friends who welcome her and later her experiences happen in select club. I don't see this sexuality as natural, empowering and fulfilling. Here, sex isn't linked to love, to feelings. So, even if Lola is good, i can just trash this so-called porno chic and i give « 1 ».